Caption Idea Best Caption
Every year, millions of Americans turn 65 and encounter a Medicare decision-making process that feels designed to confuse rather than clarify. The alphabet soup of plan letters, the interaction between Medicare Part A and Part B, the difference between Medicare Advantage and Medicare Supplement, the enrollment windows that open and close with consequences that last years — it’s enough to make people throw up their hands and pick something randomly just to make the stress stop.
That random pick is often costly. The difference between the right Medicare Supplement plan and the wrong one can reach thousands of dollars annually — sometimes in premiums you didn’t need to pay, sometimes in out-of-pocket costs you didn’t expect to incur. Getting this decision right doesn’t require a law degree or a financial planning background. It requires understanding the structure of the system, knowing which questions to ask, and applying a comparison framework that produces a defensible choice based on your actual health situation and financial priorities.
This guide walks through the comparison process from the beginning — what Medicare Supplement plans actually are, how the standardized plan structure works in your favor, what the meaningful differences between plans actually cost, and how to conduct a comparison that produces a clear answer rather than more confusion.
The Foundation: Understanding What Medicare Supplement Actually Does
Before comparing specific plans, a clear understanding of why Medicare Supplement insurance exists and what problem it solves is essential — because comparison shopping without this foundation produces choices that look rational but may not align with actual needs.
Original Medicare — Parts A and B — covers a substantial portion of most healthcare costs for people who are 65 or older or who qualify through disability. Part A covers hospital care, skilled nursing facility care, hospice, and some home health services. Part B covers physician services, outpatient care, preventive services, and medical equipment. Together, they form a genuine insurance program that prevents catastrophic medical costs from consuming retirement savings entirely.
What original Medicare doesn’t cover is the gaps — the portions of each covered service that Medicare pays less than 100% of. Specifically, Medicare Part A carries a hospital inpatient deductible per benefit period (in 2026, approximately $1,632 per benefit period), daily copayments for extended hospital stays, and no coverage at all after 150 days. Part B covers 80% of approved charges after an annual deductible, leaving 20% of all outpatient medical costs as the beneficiary’s responsibility with no cap on how much that 20% can accumulate.
That uncapped 20% Part B coinsurance is the exposure that most Medicare Supplement plans are primarily designed to address. For a Medicare beneficiary who has a major surgery, cancer treatment, or any expensive ongoing medical care, 20% of total approved charges can reach tens of thousands of dollars in a single year. A chemotherapy regimen costing $300,000 in approved charges generates $60,000 in 20% coinsurance that Medicare doesn’t cover — an amount that can devastate the retirement savings of an otherwise well-prepared retiree.
Medicare Supplement plans — also called Medigap policies — fill some or all of these gaps. Private insurance companies sell them to Medicare beneficiaries, and they pay after Medicare has paid its share, covering some or all of the remaining costs depending on the specific plan purchased. The result is that a beneficiary with comprehensive Medicare Supplement coverage may face predictable, manageable out-of-pocket costs rather than unpredictable exposure to large coinsurance and deductible amounts.
The Standardization Advantage That Most People Miss
Here is the most important structural fact about Medicare Supplement plans that simplifies the comparison process enormously: the benefits of each plan letter are standardized by federal law across all insurance companies that offer them.
This means that Plan G from Company A provides exactly the same coverage as Plan G from Company B, Company C, or any other insurer offering the same plan letter in your state. The benefits are legally required to be identical. The hospital coverage is the same. The Part B coinsurance coverage is the same. The skilled nursing facility coverage is the same. Every coverage dimension is standardized.
What is not standardized — and where the meaningful variation exists — is the premium. The same Plan G with identical benefits can cost $120 per month at one insurer and $185 per month at another insurer in the same zip code for the same 65-year-old applicant. The coverage is identical. The premium is not. This price variation — which commonly reaches 40% to 60% between the least and most expensive insurers offering the same plan letter — is where comparison shopping produces real financial results.
Understanding this standardization changes the comparison process from an apples-to-oranges complexity into a straightforward price comparison once you’ve determined which plan letter is right for your situation. You’re not comparing coverage — you’re comparing prices for the same product, which is a much simpler task.
The standardization applies in 47 states. Massachusetts, Minnesota, and Wisconsin have their own Medigap standardization systems that differ somewhat from the federal framework. Residents of these states encounter slightly different plan structures, but the underlying principle — standardized benefits that make price comparison the primary variable — applies similarly.
The Plan Letters That Actually Matter
There are ten standardized Medicare Supplement plan letters available in most states: A, B, C, D, F, G, K, L, M, and N. Of these, two attract the vast majority of new enrollees in 2026: Plan G and Plan N. Understanding why these two dominate the market — and what distinguishes them from each other and from the other plan letters — structures the comparison process around what actually matters.
Plan F: The Former Standard, Now Restricted
Plan F was historically the most popular Medicare Supplement plan because it covered everything — both the Part A deductible, the Part B deductible, the Part B coinsurance, and all other standard gap costs. For beneficiaries who purchased it, Plan F produced a genuinely first-dollar coverage experience with essentially no out-of-pocket costs for covered Medicare services.
Congress changed Plan F’s availability in 2020 through the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA). Beneficiaries who became eligible for Medicare on or after January 1, 2020 cannot purchase Plan F. Those who became eligible before that date and already had Plan F can keep it, and it remains available to that group. For anyone newly eligible for Medicare in 2020 or later — which covers anyone turning 65 today — Plan F is simply not available.
This change makes the Plan F discussion relevant primarily for beneficiaries who are evaluating whether to keep an existing Plan F or switch to an alternative. For everyone becoming Medicare-eligible for the first time, Plan F is not a meaningful option to consider.
Plan G: The Current Gold Standard
Plan G has become the most comprehensive Medicare Supplement plan available to new enrollees following Plan F’s restricted availability. It covers everything that Plan F covered with a single exception: Plan G does not cover the Medicare Part B annual deductible. In 2026, that deductible is $240.
In practice, Plan G produces near-comprehensive coverage. After paying the $240 annual Part B deductible — the only cost-sharing the beneficiary faces — Medicare and Plan G together cover 100% of all covered Medicare services for the remainder of the year. Hospital stays are covered. Physician services after the deductible are covered at 100%. Skilled nursing facility coinsurance is covered. Part A hospice coinsurance is covered. There is no coinsurance, no copayment, and no uncapped exposure for covered services.
For beneficiaries who use significant medical services — those with chronic conditions, those who anticipate surgeries, those managing ongoing specialty care — Plan G’s comprehensive coverage produces complete financial predictability. The annual budget for covered healthcare costs is precisely the sum of the annual premium plus the $240 Part B deductible. No surprise bills. No 20% coinsurance accumulation. No annual uncertainty about what a given year of health events will cost.
The premium for Plan G varies considerably by insurer, age, geographic area, and gender. In most markets, a 65-year-old female purchasing Plan G can expect monthly premiums ranging from $110 to $180 depending on the insurer. A 65-year-old male in the same market might pay $120 to $195 per month. The premium range reflects both the insurer’s pricing methodology and the variation across geographic markets — premiums are lower in rural areas and lower-cost states, higher in major metropolitan areas and states with higher healthcare utilization rates.
Plan N: The Lower-Premium Alternative
Plan N provides coverage that is nearly as comprehensive as Plan G but includes specific cost-sharing elements that reduce the premium in exchange for the beneficiary retaining some out-of-pocket exposure.
Under Plan N, the beneficiary pays the Part B deductible (same as Plan G). After the deductible is met, Plan N pays 100% of Part B coinsurance except for copayments of up to $20 for office visits and up to $50 for emergency room visits that don’t result in inpatient admission. Plan N does not cover excess charges — the amount above Medicare’s approved rate that non-participating Medicare providers can charge, up to 15% above the approved amount.
The premium for Plan N is typically 15% to 30% lower than Plan G in the same market for the same enrollee. The premium savings reflect the additional cost-sharing the beneficiary accepts — the office visit and emergency room copayments, and the potential exposure to excess charges from non-participating providers.
Whether Plan N or Plan G is the better financial choice depends on how frequently the beneficiary uses physician office visits, emergency rooms, and whether they see providers who charge excess fees. A beneficiary who sees their primary care physician quarterly and two specialists biannually generates 6 to 8 office visit copayments per year at up to $20 each — a maximum additional cost of $160 per year. If Plan N’s annual premium is $480 less than Plan G’s ($40 per month savings), the net financial advantage of Plan N is $480 minus $160, or $320 per year for this usage pattern.
Excess charges require specific attention in Plan N comparisons. Providers who don’t accept Medicare assignment — who bill above Medicare’s approved rates — can charge up to 15% above those rates, and Plan N doesn’t cover that excess. In most markets, the proportion of Medicare providers who charge excess fees is relatively small, and verifying whether your current physicians and preferred specialists participate in Medicare assignment before choosing Plan N eliminates most of this exposure.
Plan K and Plan L: The High-Cost-Sharing Options
Plans K and L provide partial coverage of various Medicare gap costs rather than comprehensive coverage, and their lower premiums reflect the higher cost-sharing they leave in place. Plan K covers 50% of most covered gap costs. Plan L covers 75%. Both have annual out-of-pocket limits — in 2026, approximately $7,060 for Plan K and $3,530 for Plan L — which cap annual exposure before coverage becomes 100%.
These plans are appropriate for beneficiaries who want premium minimization and have sufficient savings to absorb the higher cost-sharing that might occur in a significant health event year. They’re less commonly sold than Plans G and N because the coverage-to-premium trade-off is less intuitive for most beneficiaries, and the potential for high out-of-pocket costs in health-intensive years creates financial unpredictability that many retirees prefer to avoid.
Plans A, B, D, and M: The Less Commonly Used Options
These plans provide narrower coverage than Plans G and N and occupy smaller market shares. Plan A covers only Part B coinsurance and a few other basic benefits, without covering the Part A deductible or other significant gap costs. Plans B, D, and M fill various combinations of gaps at different premium levels. Unless a specific coverage combination within these plans precisely matches an unusual set of priorities, most beneficiaries are better served by comparison shopping within the G-versus-N framework.
The Pricing Variables That Drive Premium Differences
Understanding why the same plan letter costs different amounts at different insurers — and why your price may differ from a neighbor’s despite buying the same plan — helps you evaluate quotes intelligently and identify when a price difference is explained by rating methodology rather than hidden coverage differences.
Attained-Age Pricing
Most Medicare Supplement insurers use attained-age pricing — the premium is based on your current age and increases as you get older. Under this methodology, a policy purchased at 65 carries the lowest premium available under that plan at that insurer. Each year, as you age, the premium increases to reflect the higher actuarial cost of insuring an older person. These age-based increases are in addition to any general rate increases the insurer applies based on claims experience.
Attained-age pricing produces premiums that are lowest at enrollment and increase throughout the policy’s life. The cumulative premium paid over a 20-year period (ages 65 to 85) can be substantially higher than the initial premium might suggest, because the annual increases compound on an increasing base.
Issue-Age Pricing
Issue-age pricing sets the premium based on your age at the time of first purchase and doesn’t increase it as you get older. The initial premium at 65 is higher than an attained-age policy’s starting premium — because the insurer is pricing across the full expected policy period rather than just the current year — but the premium doesn’t increase due to aging. General rate increases based on claims experience still apply, but the age-based escalation is eliminated.
Issue-age policies cost more initially but may cost less over the long term for beneficiaries who remain with the same insurer for many years. The breakeven point — where the issue-age policy’s higher starting premium is offset by the lower long-term increases relative to attained-age pricing — typically occurs somewhere between seven and twelve years of coverage, depending on how aggressively attained-age premiums increase at a given insurer.
Community Rated (No-Age-Based Pricing)
Community-rated policies charge the same premium to all enrollees regardless of age. A 65-year-old and a 78-year-old pay the same premium for the same plan at a community-rated insurer. This structure is beneficial for older enrollees who join late but less favorable for younger enrollees whose premiums subsidize older members.
Only a small number of states mandate community rating as the permitted pricing structure, notably New York and Connecticut. In these states, Medicare Supplement premiums are higher for young enrollees than they’d be under attained-age pricing but don’t increase with age — a different distribution of cost over the policy lifetime.
Gender
Most insurers charge different premiums for male and female enrollees because women statistically have lower mortality rates and utilize healthcare services at different frequencies. Female premiums are typically lower than male premiums by 5% to 15% at most attained-age and issue-age insurers.
Tobacco Use
Smokers typically pay 10% to 30% more than non-smokers for Medicare Supplement coverage. This rating factor reflects the statistically higher healthcare utilization and mortality risk associated with tobacco use.
Geographic Rating
Premiums vary significantly by state and zip code, reflecting differences in regional healthcare costs, provider charges, regulatory environments, and claims experience. A Plan G premium in rural Mississippi differs materially from a Plan G premium in suburban New York even from the same national insurer.
Household Discounts
Many insurers offer discounts of 5% to 14% when two members of the same household both purchase policies from the same insurer. For married couples both purchasing Medicare Supplement coverage simultaneously, this discount is worth specifically seeking — it requires both applications be submitted with the same insurer to qualify.
The Enrollment Window: When Timing Determines Access
The Medigap Open Enrollment Period is the most favorable window for purchasing Medicare Supplement insurance, and understanding its boundaries prevents the mistake of assuming it extends indefinitely.
The Medigap Open Enrollment Period begins when you are both 65 or older and enrolled in Medicare Part B. It lasts for six months. During this window, insurers are legally required to sell you any Medicare Supplement plan they offer at the standard rate for your age and location — they cannot deny you coverage or charge you a higher rate based on your health history, regardless of pre-existing conditions.
This guaranteed issue right is one of the most valuable protections in the Medicare system. A 65-year-old with a history of cancer, heart disease, diabetes, and other chronic conditions can purchase Plan G during their Medigap Open Enrollment Period at exactly the same premium as a 65-year-old in perfect health. The health history cannot be used to deny coverage or increase the premium during this specific window.
After the six-month open enrollment window closes, the guaranteed issue protection generally disappears. Insurers in most states can medically underwrite applicants who apply outside the open enrollment window — asking health questions, reviewing medical history, and either declining coverage or charging higher premiums based on health status. The conditions that were irrelevant during the open enrollment window become highly relevant and potentially disqualifying afterward.
There are specific exceptions — guaranteed issue rights that apply outside the open enrollment window in certain circumstances: losing other creditable coverage involuntarily, moving out of a Medicare Advantage plan’s service area, and other defined situations. But these exceptions are narrow and specific — they don’t provide the broad guaranteed issue access that the open enrollment period provides.
The practical implication is significant: shopping and purchasing Medicare Supplement coverage during the six-month open enrollment window is structurally preferable to waiting and hoping health remains sufficient for underwriting approval later. The health conditions that develop between 65 and 70, 65 and 75, or 65 and beyond are precisely the conditions that would generate premium increases or declinations under medical underwriting — and locking in coverage during the open enrollment window prevents that health-based repricing permanently.
The Medicare Advantage Question That Complicates the Comparison
A complete guide to Medicare Supplement comparison must address the Medicare Advantage versus Medicare Supplement decision that many new Medicare enrollees face — because choosing Medicare Advantage instead of Original Medicare with a supplement changes the entire framework.
Medicare Advantage plans — offered by private insurers under contract with Medicare — replace Original Medicare rather than supplementing it. Instead of Medicare paying its share and a Medigap policy filling the gaps, Medicare Advantage pays for covered services through the private plan’s network and cost-sharing structure.
Medicare Advantage plans typically carry lower or sometimes zero monthly premiums because they receive Medicare’s capitated payment directly. Many include prescription drug coverage, dental, vision, and hearing benefits that original Medicare doesn’t cover. These features make Medicare Advantage plans look attractive in a surface comparison against a Medicare Supplement premium that might run $150 per month.
The trade-offs that the premium comparison obscures are meaningful. Medicare Advantage plans have network restrictions — you typically must use in-network providers and get referrals for specialists. Out-of-pocket costs, while capped annually, can reach $4,000 to $8,000 in a health-intensive year. The coverage for specific services — particularly high-cost specialty care, cancer treatment at specialized centers, and care while traveling — may be more limited than Original Medicare with a supplement.
The health condition dimension matters significantly here. For beneficiaries in excellent health who use few medical services, Medicare Advantage’s low premium and bundled benefits can produce lower total annual costs than Medicare with a supplement. For beneficiaries managing chronic conditions, seeking specialty care at academic medical centers, or anticipating significant health events, the comprehensive and predictable coverage of Medicare with Plan G or Plan N often produces better financial outcomes despite the higher premium — because the out-of-pocket costs in Medicare Advantage for significant care can quickly exceed what a supplement’s premium costs annually.
The switching flexibility also differs. Switching between Medicare Supplement plans after the open enrollment window involves medical underwriting in most states, meaning health changes that occurred after original enrollment can result in declination or higher rates. Switching into Medicare Advantage from original Medicare and then wanting to return to original Medicare with a supplement involves the same underwriting challenge — the health conditions that may have developed during the Medicare Advantage years are now subject to underwriting review.
This switching difficulty is a structural reason that many Medicare planning advisors recommend Original Medicare with a comprehensive supplement for new enrollees in reasonable health — particularly those with any significant health history — rather than starting with Medicare Advantage and attempting to switch later if the coverage becomes inadequate.
Building Your Comparison Framework
With the structural understanding established, the actual comparison process follows a sequence that produces a defensible choice without requiring analysis paralysis.
Step 1: Determine whether Original Medicare with a supplement or Medicare Advantage better fits your situation
If you have an established specialist relationship at a major medical center, manage a serious chronic condition, travel extensively, or place high value on maximum provider flexibility, Original Medicare with a supplement is typically the appropriate foundation. If you’re in excellent health, have straightforward medical needs, and value the bundled benefits that Medicare Advantage plans include, a Medicare Advantage comparison is worth running parallel to the supplement comparison.
Step 2: Decide between Plan G and Plan N as your primary comparison targets
For most new Medicare enrollees, the meaningful choice is between these two plans. Run through the specific factors that favor each:
Factors that favor Plan G: Frequent physician visits that would generate multiple $20 Plan N copayments, regular use of specialists, plans to seek care at academic medical centers where non-participating providers may charge excess fees, preference for complete premium predictability without any cost-sharing uncertainty.
Factors that favor Plan N: Lower frequency of office visits (fewer than one per month on average), confirmed that current physicians and preferred specialists accept Medicare assignment (eliminating excess charge risk), willingness to accept modest copayment cost-sharing in exchange for meaningfully lower monthly premiums.
Step 3: Gather quotes from at least eight to ten carriers in your area
The standardization advantage only produces savings if you actually shop across multiple carriers. Accepting the first quote presented — whether from a broker, an insurer’s marketing materials, or an online advertisement — captures none of the price variation that comparison shopping reveals.
Resources for gathering quotes include your State Health Insurance Assistance Program (SHIP) — a federally funded, free counseling resource in every state that can provide unbiased comparison assistance and access to plan availability in your area. Medicare’s plan comparison tool at medicare.gov allows comparison of some plan options. Independent insurance brokers who represent multiple carriers can provide quotes across their carrier portfolio simultaneously.
When gathering quotes, provide the same information to every carrier — exact date of birth, tobacco status, zip code of residence, and requested plan letter. Consistency ensures you’re comparing equivalent quotes rather than mixing different rating inputs.
Step 4: Evaluate carrier financial strength and longevity
Since premium differences between carriers offering the same plan are the primary variable, it’s tempting to simply choose the least expensive option. A secondary consideration worth applying is the financial stability and market track record of the insurer.
A.M. Best financial strength ratings — publicly available at ambest.com — assess insurers’ financial health and claims-paying ability. A rating of A or better (A, A+, A++) indicates strong financial stability. Medicare Supplement premiums are regulated by state insurance departments, but an insurer’s financial health affects their ability to maintain coverage commitments and manage their book of business over decades.
Equally important is the insurer’s rate increase history. An insurer offering the lowest current premium but with a history of aggressive annual rate increases may not remain the lowest-premium option in five years. The insurer with a slightly higher current premium but a track record of modest, predictable annual increases may produce lower total cost over a ten to twenty year horizon. SHIP counselors often have access to historical rate increase data that helps assess this dimension.
Step 5: Calculate the total annual cost — not just the monthly premium
Compare plans and carriers on total annual cost: monthly premium times twelve, plus the Part B deductible ($240), plus any anticipated copayments for Plan N. This annualized comparison gives a more complete picture than monthly premium alone.
For example, if Plan G from Carrier A costs $155 per month and Plan N from Carrier B costs $120 per month, the annual premium difference is $420. Against that $420 savings, estimate your annual copayment exposure under Plan N based on your expected office visit frequency. If you expect 8 office visits at up to $20 each, your maximum additional Plan N cost is $160, making the net annual advantage of Plan N approximately $260. If you expect 20 office visits across primary care and multiple specialists, the additional copayment exposure narrows or eliminates the financial advantage of Plan N.
Step 6: Apply the household discount where applicable
If a spouse or domestic partner will also be purchasing Medicare Supplement coverage, identify carriers that offer household discounts and factor those discounts into the carrier comparison. A 10% household discount on a $1,800 annual premium saves $180 per year — for both household members, the combined savings reach $360 annually, which compounds over many years of coverage.
The Prescription Drug Coverage Gap That Requires a Separate Decision
Medicare Supplement plans don’t cover prescription drugs — with very limited exceptions for plans sold before 2006 that included drug coverage grandfathered from a prior era. For prescription drug coverage, Medicare beneficiaries with Original Medicare need to add a Part D prescription drug plan as a separate enrollment.
Part D plans are sold by private insurers and carry their own premiums, deductibles, and formularies. The enrollment decision for Part D is separate from the Medicare Supplement decision but happens on a parallel timeline — both should be in place before Medicare becomes primary coverage.
Failing to enroll in a Part D plan during the initial enrollment period when Medicare begins — and not having other creditable prescription drug coverage — generates a late enrollment penalty that is permanent. The penalty is 1% of the national base beneficiary premium for every month without creditable drug coverage, added to the Part D premium for as long as coverage is maintained. A two-year gap in creditable drug coverage adds 24% to the standard Part D premium permanently.
Even Medicare beneficiaries who currently take no prescription medications should evaluate Part D enrollment during their initial enrollment period because the cost of the late enrollment penalty, applied over many years of future drug coverage, typically exceeds the cost of enrolling in a low-premium Part D plan during the penalty-free window.
When to Seek Professional Guidance
The comparison framework described in this guide is sufficient for most beneficiaries to reach a well-informed decision independently. Certain situations genuinely benefit from personalized professional guidance that goes beyond what general comparison tools provide.
Complex medical histories that might affect coverage or pricing decisions, particularly for beneficiaries considering switching Medicare Supplement plans outside the open enrollment window where medical underwriting applies. Situations where Medicare Advantage might genuinely be more appropriate based on specific health and lifestyle factors that generic guidance doesn’t capture. Coordination of Medicare with employer coverage for beneficiaries who are still working at 65 or whose spouse has employer coverage that creates coordination-of-benefits questions. Low-income situations where Medicare Savings Programs or Extra Help for Part D may dramatically reduce overall Medicare costs in ways that should be explored before purchasing any supplement.
The State Health Insurance Assistance Program (SHIP) provides free, unbiased counseling from trained volunteers in every state. These counselors aren’t selling insurance — they’re helping beneficiaries understand their options and navigate enrollment decisions. For anyone feeling overwhelmed by the comparison process, scheduling a SHIP appointment before making any enrollment decision is the single most reliable way to get personalized guidance without the sales pressure that accompanies most insurer-sponsored educational resources.
The Decision That Compounds Over Decades
The Medicare Supplement decision you make at 65 has implications that extend across potentially 20, 25, or 30 years of retirement. The plan you choose, the insurer you select, and the timing of your enrollment all create a financial and healthcare foundation that shapes how health costs interact with your retirement finances for decades.
The good news embedded in that long time horizon is that a careful decision made during the open enrollment window — comparing multiple plan letters against your actual health situation, shopping across at least eight to ten carriers, evaluating pricing methodology alongside current premiums, and confirming drug coverage enrollment — produces a foundation that reliably performs as intended. The coverage is standardized, the protections are legally guaranteed, and the financial predictability of a comprehensive supplement turns the potentially catastrophic variable of healthcare costs into a manageable, foreseeable budget line.
The comparison process that feels overwhelming at the beginning becomes straightforward once you understand that you’re not comparing coverage — you’re comparing prices for the same standardized product. The plan letter question narrows quickly to Plan G versus Plan N for most people. The carrier question becomes a price and rate-history comparison among multiple insurers offering identical benefits. The timing question resolves simply: enroll during the six-month open enrollment window and capture the guaranteed issue protection that makes health history irrelevant.
Medicare Supplement comparison doesn’t require expertise or exhaustive research. It requires a clear framework, access to multiple quotes, and the willingness to invest a few hours in a decision whose financial impact compounds across three decades of retirement. That investment is among the highest-return uses of time available to anyone approaching Medicare eligibility — and the cost of not making it, measured in years of overpaid premiums or unexpected out-of-pocket costs, is significantly higher than the effort required to get it right.
